header-logo header-logo

07 January 2010 / Paul Dacam , Jamie Potter
Issue: 7399 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Trump Card

Local government accountability beats commercial confidentiality, say Paul Dacam & Jamie Potter

A recent High Court ruling on the interpretation of a legislative provision dating back to the early 19th century is likely to have considerable ramifications for those contracting with local authorities.

In particular, the ruling significantly increases the risk of disclosure of sensitive information provided by contractors to local government authorities, irrespective of any potential commercial prejudice or breach of confidentiality.

The case R (on the application of the Veolia ES Nottinghamshire Ltd) v Nottinghamshire County Council [2009] All ER (D) 78 (Oct) involved an application by Veolia for judicial review of the decision of Nottinghamshire County Council (Notts CC) to disclose certain documents relating to a waste management PFI contract between Veolia and Notts CC (the PFI contract) that Veolia had won through a public tender.

The documents in question had been requested by an environmental activist, in his capacity as a local elector, and comprised the payment and performance mechanism and KPI schedules to the PFI contract, as well as the itemised invoices submitted by Veolia to Notts CC.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll