header-logo header-logo

04 November 2011 / James Harrison
Issue: 7488 / Categories: Features , Family , Property
printer mail-detail

Trouble & strife

James Harrison examines the impact of bankruptcy on marriage

“For better, for worse, for richer, for poorer…” While nobody enters a marriage expecting it all to go wrong, in these rocky times, the threat of bankruptcy is ever present. It is often only at the time of bankruptcy, by this stage too late, that spouses realise how exposed they are to a cold-hearted trustee in bankruptcy selling their home from under them. While it may feel like their life is collapsing like a house of cards, in terms of bricks and mortar, the non-bankrupt spouse’s position requires detailed analysis to ascertain what they own.

Understanding what the spouse owns and how that interest is valued is key whether you are structuring a couple’s affairs when bankruptcy is not an issue, or seeking to protect or assert a beneficial interest in the face of a trustee in bankruptcy investigating the bankrupt spouse’s interest. This article looks at the key legal principles in valuing the non-bankrupt spouse’s interests and the recent legal developments in this ever-evolving area of law. While we will focus on the law

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll