header-logo header-logo

15 November 2007 / Steve Gallagher
Issue: 7297 / Categories: Features , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Trouble brewing

Will the new religious hate law help or hinder the cause of freedom? Steve Gallagher wonders

Despite the Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006 (RRHA 2006) receiving Royal Assent on 16 February 2006, it was hoped by many commentators that no commencement order would ever be made for this potentially troublesome Act.

Unfortunately for them, the Racial and Religious Hatred Act 2006 (Commencement No1) Order (SI 2490/2007) has implemented most of RRHA 2006 into the law of England and Wales from 1 October 2007.
After long debate over the original Bill the House of Lords watered down the government’s proposals, significantly affecting their impact:
- Unlike racial offences the offences must be “threatening” not just “abusive” or “insulting”.
- The words, actions, materials, recordings etc must also be “intended” to stir up religious hatred.
- Section 29B—the offence may be committed in a public or private place, but there is no offence if “the words or behaviour are used, or the written material displayed”, inside a dwelling and only heard or seen by other persons inside that or another private dwelling.
- Section 29L—no proceedings may be instituted without the consent

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll