header-logo header-logo

19 February 2015
Issue: 7641 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Tribunals "fit for purpose"

The tribunals structure has been declared “fit for purpose” by the Senior President of Tribunals, Sir Jeremy Sullivan, in his Annual Report.

More than 850,000 cases were determined during the financial year 2013-14 by nearly 6,000 tribunal judges and non-legal members. The introduction of fees for employment hearings reduced applications to just 20% of the levels of previous years. Appeals were also reduced but to a lesser extent—the London office of the Employment Appeal Tribunal received 55% of the applications of previous years.

The Immigration and Asylum Chamber dealt with an unexpected increase in managed migration receipts as the Home Office attempted to clear historical backlogs, and the forecasted decrease in appeals failed to materialise as there was a higher propensity to appeal.

Issue: 7641 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll