header-logo header-logo

21 May 2009 / Geraldine Morris
Issue: 7370 / Categories: Features , Media , Procedure & practice , Family
printer mail-detail

Transparency rules, ok?

Geraldine Morris outlines the recent rule changes arising from granting media access to family courts

Few areas of law are as newsworthy to the media as family proceedings. Following a concerted campaign by pressure groups and various government consultations, the family courts were opened to the media from the 27 April 2009. The media have quickly realised however that that access is subject to stringent rules.

Family proceedings courts

The Family Proceedings Courts (Miscellaneous Amendments) Rules 2009 (SI 2009/858) came into effect from the 27 April 2009 amending the Family Proceedings Courts (Children Act 1989) Rules 1991 (SI 1991/1395) and the Family Proceedings Courts (Child Support Act 1991) Rules 1993 (SI 1993/627).

The amendments concern the attendance of persons, in particular representatives of the media, during proceedings in the family proceedings court relating to children, and the communication of information relating to such proceedings. The new rules insert into the Family Proceedings Courts (Children Act 1989) Rules 1991 a new r 16A, which provides for who may be present during a hearing in “relevant proceedings”. This in particular allows for duly accredited

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll