header-logo header-logo

Trade marks

12 September 2013
Issue: 7575 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Regents University v Regent’s University London [2013] EWPCC 39, [2013] All ER (D) 50 (Sep)

When considering an application to stay under art 104 of Council Regulation (EC) 207/2009 (on the Community Trade Mark), the first task was to identify what, if any, “special grounds” there were in the case of the kind referred to in art 104(1) of the Regulation, and if there were any, to ask whether they were sufficiently compelling to outweigh the strong presumption in favour of granting a stay. In doing so, it was necessary to bear in mind both the underlying rationale of art 104 of the Regulation (to minimise the risk of irreconcilable judgments) and also the potential availability in an appropriate case of protective and provisional measures under art 104(3) of the Regulation.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll