header-logo header-logo

11 April 2014
Issue: 7602 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Trade marks

PI-Design AG and other companies v Yoshida Metal Industry Co Ltd C-337/12 P to C-340/12 P, [2014] All ER (D) 286 (Mar)

Pursuant to Art 4 of Council Regulation (EC) 40/94 (on the Community trade mark) (the Regulation), so far as Community trade marks were concerned, a sign representing the shape of a product fell among the signs which might constitute a trade mark provided that it was capable of being represented graphically and capable of distinguishing the products or services of one undertaking from those of other undertakings. It was also apparent from the case-law of the Court that each of the grounds for refusal of registration listed in Art 7(1) of the Regulation should be interpreted in the light of the public interest underlying that ground. In that context, the Court had had occasion to point out that Art 7(1)(e)(ii) of the Regulation was intended to prevent trade mark law granting an undertaking a monopoly on technical solutions or functional characteristics of a product. Further, the court had also had occasion to make clear that a correct application of that provision required that the essential

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll