header-logo header-logo

05 March 2010
Issue: 7407 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Trade marks

Hotel Cipriani SRL and others v Cipriani (Grosvenor Street) Ltd and others [2010] EWCA Civ 110

If an application to register a Community Trade Mark (CTM) was made in bad faith, then under Art 51(1)(b) of Council Regulation 40/9/EEC the registration was to be declared invalid. Attention was to be focused on the position at the time of the application for registration, and the intention and state of mind of the applicant at that time, although they were subjective factors, they were to be determined by reference to the objective circumstances of the particular case.

A CTM did not entitle the proprietor to prohibit a third party from using in the course of trade his own name or address, provided that the third party used them in accordance with honest practices in industrial or commercial matters. Using an established trading name might well satisfy the test of honest use, whereas to adopt a new corporate or trading name for a business which conflicted with an existing registered trade mark was unlikely to do so.

The mischief of a misleading name, was to be dealt with by reference

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll