header-logo header-logo

05 March 2010
Issue: 7407 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Trade marks

Hotel Cipriani SRL and others v Cipriani (Grosvenor Street) Ltd and others [2010] EWCA Civ 110

If an application to register a Community Trade Mark (CTM) was made in bad faith, then under Art 51(1)(b) of Council Regulation 40/9/EEC the registration was to be declared invalid. Attention was to be focused on the position at the time of the application for registration, and the intention and state of mind of the applicant at that time, although they were subjective factors, they were to be determined by reference to the objective circumstances of the particular case.

A CTM did not entitle the proprietor to prohibit a third party from using in the course of trade his own name or address, provided that the third party used them in accordance with honest practices in industrial or commercial matters. Using an established trading name might well satisfy the test of honest use, whereas to adopt a new corporate or trading name for a business which conflicted with an existing registered trade mark was unlikely to do so.

The mischief of a misleading name, was to be dealt with by reference

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll