header-logo header-logo

26 February 2009 / Rodney Gardner
Issue: 7358 / Categories: Features , Banking , Competition , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Toxic Invasion

In the hope of writing off loans, many people are being exploited by case management companies, says Rodney Gardner

The Competition Commission (CC) has recently announced a ban on the sale of payment protection policies, at the point of sale, such requirements to be implemented by next year. Several banks have already agreed voluntarily to impose a ban now and it is thus apposite to consider the law and practice that is presently evolving with regard to such claims.

Claims management companies (CMCs) have been seeking refunds from banks for some time now on behalf of borrowers who have been sold single premium policies when applying for both secured and unsecured loans, many of the people affected being within the lower socio-economic groupings. The CC has found that policies being sold are uncompetitive, and CMCs have in the past had some success in gaining refunds on the grounds of unsuitability and/or ineligibility of the debtor.

The only way a CMC can advance a client’s claim, which is rejected, is to refer it to the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS), which is a lengthy

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll