header-logo header-logo

17 March 2011
Issue: 7457 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Toxic claims

Investment banks will be hit by a rash of high value court claims over “toxic” financial products later this year, a senior commercial lawyer has predicted.

Reynolds Porter Chamberlain’s head of financial disputes, Tom Hibbert, says investors who were sold products before the credit crunch are nearing the time limit for bringing legal proceedings. There will also be an increase in products reaching their maturity date this year, which means investors will have to account for their loss.

“The courts haven’t yet clarified whether the six year limitation runs from the sale of the product or the date at which the product’s value collapsed,” he says.

“Investors do not want to risk missing the chance for their case to be heard because they waited too long, so they will start court proceedings soon. The instinct of many institutional investors has been to seek to renegotiate or restructure transactions but many of those dialogues are coming to an end.

“Moreover, if investors approached the bank that sold them the product a year or more ago the bank might have been willing to restructure the product. Now that the synthetic collateralised debt obligations (CDOs) are nearing their expiry date and it is clear that they are more or less worthless the banks may be less willing to negotiate with investors, thus forcing them into litigation.”

According to Hibbert, the main types of product involved will be synthetic CDOs.
 

Issue: 7457 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll