header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
14 April 2011
Issue: 7461 + 7462 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Town & country planning—Development—Permission

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Welwyn Hatfield Borough Council v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and another [2011] UKSC 15, [2011] All ER (D) 44 (Apr)

Supreme Court, Lord Phillips P, Lord Rodger, Lord Walker, Lord Hale, Lord Brown, Lord Mance and Lord Clarke SCJJ, 6 Apr 2011

The word “use” in s 171B(2) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (TCP 1990) is directed to real or material use, not permitted use. Moreover, it  would be contrary to public policy for a person who builds a house in breach of planning permission, and deliberately conceals it from the local authority for four years, to enjoy the benefits of the planning laws in order to obtain a certificate of lawfulness in respect of that house. 

James Findlay QC and Wayne Beglan (instructed by Sharpe Pritchard) for the authority. James Maurici QC and Sarah-Jane Davies (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the secretary of state. Alexander Booth (instructed by Sherrards) for B.

In December 2001, the second defendant, B, was granted a second planning permission by the claimant local authority for the erection

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll