header-logo header-logo

11 December 2014 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7634 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Tough times

robins_1

Jon Robins reports on the latest clashes surrounding the LASPO cutbacks

When Margaret Hodge, as chair of the House of Commons public accounts committee, grilled Google executives, she famously quoted its corporate motto “Don’t be evil” before reflecting “I think that you do do evil”. There was an echo of that bruising encounter when her committee hauled senior Ministry of Justice (MoJ) executives over the coals last week.

Margaret Hodge asked Catherine Lee, director of access to justice at the MoJ, whether her job was “about facilitating or inhibiting access to justice”? The session began badly for the MoJ before going rapidly downhill.

Their interrogation followed on from last month’s National Audit Office (NAO) report (Implementing reforms to civil legal aid). It accused ministers of not “thinking through enough” the impact of the LASPO cuts, nor, it was argued, did they sufficiently understand whether those still eligible for legal aid could actually find help. As a consequence, the spending watchdog argued that £300m worth of legal aid cuts could not be said to have “delivered better overall value for money for the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll