header-logo header-logo

24 February 2011
Issue: 7454 / Categories: Case law , Law reports
printer mail-detail

Tort—Harassment—Prohibition of harassment

Iqbal v Dean Manson Solicitors [2011] EWCA Civ 123, [2011] All ER (D) 163 (Feb)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Rix, Smith and Richards LJJ, 15 Feb 2011

A partnership can be a defendant to a civil action under s 3 of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (PFH 1997).

The claimant appeared in person. Christopher Brown (instructed by Thompson & Co Solicitors) for the defendant.

The claimant worked as an assistant solicitor for the defendant firm. In January 2009 the defendant issued proceedings against three defendants. Meanwhile the claimant had left and set up his own firm, and was instructed to act in the proceedings by one defendant. The defendant then wrote a series of three letters to the claimant’s firm, for the attention of the claimant.

There was only one full partner of the defendant whose name at that time was on its stationery. The three letters made allegations against the claimant’s professional and personal integrity, and stated that he had been summarily dismissed for his “continued insubordination and reckless conduct”. After receiving the second letter the claimant brought proceedings under PFH 1997.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll