header-logo header-logo

Tort

18 November 2016
Issue: 7723 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

TRK and another v ICM [2016] EWHC 2810 (QB), [2016] All ER (D) 71 (Nov)

The Queen’s Bench Division granted the claimants injunctions, restraining the defendant from engaging in harassment of them and from making disclosures which they alleged would represent a misuse of their private information. To allow disclosure of information flowing from the defendant’s unauthorised, wrongful act of hacking to harass the claimants with threats of disclosure of their extra-marital relationship would be to permit the use of such wrongdoing as a springboard. 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll