header-logo header-logo

07 July 2020
Issue: 7894 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Discrimination , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Top firms sign Race Fairness Commitment

Magic Circle, global and City law firms have signed a pledge to implement data-driven measures to tackle the career obstacles that unfairly hold back black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) lawyers

The Race Fairness Commitment (RFC), signed by 17 top law firms, mandates close analysis of quantitative data and monitoring of progress from recruitment to senior promotion so firms can identify the points at which BAME lawyers face a disadvantage.

The RFC includes measures to ensure junior ethnic minority lawyers have access to senior management, and race and racism are talked about in every induction and exit interview. Interview and offer rates, retention rates, pay and promotion rates will be actively monitored as they relate to ethnic minority lawyers; and, where appropriate, published. There is an explicit commitment to foster workplaces where ‘everyone can have authenticity of speech and culture―no more fitting in and no more being “othered”’.

The initiative has been organised by the firms in partnership with Rare, a diversity recruitment specialist. While most leading law firms now recruit graduate trainees that are as ethnically diverse as the population, this diversity has not been maintained at management level. According to Rare’s own research, BAME lawyers spend on average 20% less time at firms than their white colleagues before leaving.

Raphael Mokades, founder and managing director of Rare, said: ‘What seems possible in terms of racial justice has shifted this year, and the Race Fairness Commitment is about real change. It’s a brave step for the law firms to take, as well as a necessary one. It goes beyond merely not discriminating, and it goes beyond the usual diversity and inclusion activities you see at many organisations. For law firms, it’s about recognising a problem and hunting it down, and I’m delighted that so many have taken this major step.’

Roy Appiah, Rare alumnus and senior associate at Clifford Chance, said: ‘I’ve sometimes had to take the bass out of my voice.

‘I’ve felt unable to express frustration, even when that frustration was justifiable. I used to feel cautious about leading, or taking on additional responsibilities, out of concern that any failing of mine would confirm that people like me do not belong.

‘It is no coincidence that I am a better lawyer when I feel I can be myself.’

For further details about the RFC, view: www.Racefairnesscommitment.com.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll