header-logo header-logo

09 October 2015
Issue: 7671 / Categories: Legal News , In Court
printer mail-detail

Top 15 cases reviewed

Lord Neuberger, President of the Supreme Court, has surveyed the 15 most significant cases of the last 150 years, which were named in a poll of lawyers by the Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England and Wales, which is celebrating its 150th anniversary.

Giving the keynote address at the anniversary event this week, Lord Neuberger said that law reporters “played a vital part in the perception and development of the law”. He outlined the importance and relevance of such cases as Rylands v Fletcher , which decided the liability of a person who keeps something on his land which is likely to do damage if it escapes.

 

Issue: 7671 / Categories: Legal News , In Court
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll