header-logo header-logo

26 March 2009
Issue: 7362 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Top 100 not interested in LDPs

Lead players are showing scant interest in the new model law firms

Only 5% of the UK’s top 100 law firms believe the Legal Services Act 2007 (LSA 2007) will have a “significant impact” on them.

Reforms under the Act, which come into force next week, introduce Legal Disciplinary Practices (LDPs)—law firms which include non-solicitor lawyers, and up to 25% non-lawyers.

The top 100 firms were quizzed by professional regulation law firm, Legal Risk LLP, for its sixth annual survey on professional indemnity and risk management.

Partner Frank Maher says: “Interest is very low, and we are not seeing what was envisaged, which was the head of marketing or IT becoming a partner.”

Maher says that a fifth of the top 100 firms, and a third of top 30 firms, thought the Act would have “no impact”, while the rest thought it would have “little impact”.

“Realistically, in the current economic climate, firms are not appointing many new partners, and we have had some people questioning why they would want to take on the liability of being a partner. Also, this is only an interim measure, and any firm that converts to LDP status now will have to convert to Alternative Business Structures in a few years’ time and conform to a whole new set of regulations,” Maher adds.

The survey also reveals that 16% of the firms questioned had delayed renewing their insurance because of concerns about the industry. Maher says: “This is a real issue. It’s not just about how secure these companies are now, but in five or seven years’ time when they have to pay out on claims.”

A third of firms chose Travelers as their insurer, and 22% chose QBE. Some 14% of fi rms overall, and 23% of top 30 firms, said they had changed their insurer, with price cited price as the main reason.

Issue: 7362 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll