header-logo header-logo

25 March 2016 / Chantal-Aimée Doerries KC
Issue: 7692 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

Too much, too soon

Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC warns against the rush to embrace online justice

Lord Justice Briggs’ recent interim report, Civil Courts Structure Review, covers a number of areas. The proposal which has received the most attention is the so-called “online court” (OC), fairly acknowledged by Lord Justice Briggs as “the single most radical and important structural change” with which his interim report is concerned. There are few who would dispute that the court system, and the experience of many a litigant and judge, could be substantially improved by the use of digital tools and modern information technology (IT). And it is good news indeed that at least for IT the government has committed necessary funds for investment in our justice system. But we need to be careful how and when, and to what extent, we make use of modern technology, and indeed how much faith we place in it. Many of the major government IT projects have a history of costly failure either in conception or implementation and those that have completed have often been significantly modified and delayed before being rolled out.

The interim

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll