header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
04 December 2008 / Karl Deakin
Issue: 7348 / Categories: Features , Terms&conditions , Employment
printer mail-detail

Toil & trouble

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Karl Deakin reflects on another difficult year for interpreting the Working Time Regulations

The Working Time Regulations 1998 (SI 1998/1833) (the Regulations) have provided much toil for the tribunals since their introduction in October 1998, and this year has been no exception.

The employment tribunal in Miles v Linkage Community Trust Limited (unreported at first instance) EAT/0618/07/DA, quoted by the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT), complained of the complexity of the Regulations stating “frankly we do not criticise any employer who [is] not able to interpret them and apply them accurately”. Anyone who has had to advise on the Regulations can probably sympathise.

Basic entitlements to rest
In addition to minimum annual leave, workers under the Regulations are entitled to:
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll