header-logo header-logo

Self-disclosure: To out or be outed?

233326
Self-disclosure in a reputational crisis: Hanna Basha & Jamie Hurworth weigh up the benefits & pitfalls

Why did John Torode out himself as being the subject of an upheld finding of racist language during the investigation into co-host Gregg Wallace—even though he denied the allegation? Reputational genius or career suicide?

Torode’s decision was surprising because individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy when subject to a police investigation, up to the point of being charged with an offence, and employment, disciplinary or regulatory investigations are often conducted confidentially.

We don’t know if there was a risk of leaks, or if there had been any threats from media groups or elsewhere to out him, but if Torode had not named himself, it was unlikely that he could have been named at all at that stage.

A summary of the Wallace investigation published online revealed two upheld allegations about other individuals. By outing himself, Torode chose to avoid a media guessing game—possibly learning from the 2023 Huw Edwards case. At that time, The Sun published claims about

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll