header-logo header-logo

26 March 2014
Issue: 7600 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Times loss

Journalist loses appeal in Supreme Court over Freedom of Information request

A journalist for The Times has lost his Supreme Court case to force the Charity Commission to release documents relating to an inquiry into George Galloway MP’s Mariam Appeal charity. 

The Mariam Appeal was launched by Galloway in 1998 following the imposition of sanctions against Iraq. The Commission’s inquiry took place in 2003-2004.

Kennedy v Charity Commission [2014] UKSC 20 concerned the question of whether the fact documents held by a public authority pursuant to an inquiry are statutorily exempt from Freedom of Information Act requests for 30 years after the inquiry, is a breach of Art 10(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights.

The Justices dismissed Kennedy’s appeal, since an absolute exemption from disclosure existed as a matter of ordinary statutory construction.

David White, solicitor, IP and commercial, Rollits, says: “Interestingly, both Lord Wilson and Lord Carnwath stated that Mr Kennedy had a right to receive the requested information pursuant to his right to freedom of expression under Art 10 of the ECHR. 

“Furthermore, they held that the absolute exemption granted by s 32(2) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 should be read so that it expires at the end of the relevant inquiry rather than expiring 30 years following the completion of the inquiry. In my view, if the position of Lords Wilson and Carnwarth were upheld, public inquiries would be subject to earlier scrutiny and comment leading, potentially, to greater openness and transparency on public authorities.  

“This surely reflects the overall intention behind freedom of information. If this had been the prevailing view, however, it could have had a chilling effect on the effective conduct of inquiries. It could have caused a reluctance by third parties to be forthcoming in the provision of full information to a public authority conducting an inquiry, the irony being that such a chilling effect has the potential to reduce the very transparency FOIA seeks to uphold.”

Issue: 7600 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll