header-logo header-logo

24 April 2024
Issue: 8068 / Categories: Legal News , Litigation funding
printer mail-detail

Timeline announced for PACCAR review

The Civil Justice Council has set a deadline of summer 2024 for its interim report into post-PACCAR reforms, with the full report due by summer 2025

Under the terms of reference, published this week, the review will set out the current position of third-party funding, consider whether third-party funding should be regulated and whether current arrangements deliver effective access to justice, and make clear recommendations for reform.

Last year, the Supreme Court held some litigation funding agreements are unenforceable, in R (PACCAR) v Competition Appeal Tribunal [2023] UKSC 28.

The Litigation Funding Agreements (Enforceability) Bill, currently before Parliament, will make it easier for litigants to secure third-party funding for claims against large corporations.

Martyn Day, co-president of Collective Redress Lawyers Association, said: ‘We will encourage the review to carefully consider the pitfalls of “over regulating” the sector and the inherent dangers of artificially limiting the remuneration available to funders.’

Issue: 8068 / Categories: Legal News , Litigation funding
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll