header-logo header-logo

21 July 2017
Issue: 7755 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Time to take a back seat?

Alec Samuels on older drivers—are they safe?

Today there are many more older drivers (for this purpose defined as over 70) than before, well over four million, and representing a bigger proportion of all drivers. Every three years older drivers submit a renewal form to the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) and answer the question: ‘Have you been told by a consultant or eye specialist that you have a problem with the field of vision?’ There is no legal obligation to have an eye test. They make a self-assessment, and answer that they do not have a problem. They may be lying, reckless, mistaken, or simply ignorant. Understandably, they wish to retain their licence. The DVLA can ask for an eye test, and for the result to be reported to them, but rarely does so.

Defects

The potential defects of older drivers are well known. They are slow to react, slow to meet a challenge, less confident. They may be under the influence of medication. Their physical frailty makes them more vulnerable to injury. They will be less competent in congested and similar difficult situations,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll