header-logo header-logo

20 March 2015 / Alan Kershaw
Issue: 7645 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Time to switch?

nlj_7645_alan-kershaw_0

Alan Kershaw explains why CILEx Regulation stands out in a crowded market

The Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) has come a very long way over the past seven years.

As chair of its regulatory arm, ILEX Professional Standards Ltd (IPS), which we are now renaming CILEx Regulation, I have seen the realisation of aspirations which Chartered Legal Executives have nurtured for a generation or more: robust and affordable educational arrangements producing lawyers fully competent in their field; a diverse and vibrant professional community accurately reflecting the communities it serves; sensible, adult requirements for continuing professional development; the Royal Charter, recognising the Institute’s standing and its demonstrable public interest focus; modern, proportionate arrangements for regulation which are—believe it or not—recognised by CILEx members as a major benefit of their membership. And now, setting the seal, the right to practise in their own names as independent practitioners in all the legal specialties—litigation, advocacy, conveyancing, probate, immigration—and therefore to set up their own firms, which can themselves be regulated by CILEx Regulation.

Since 5 January this year we have been open for business as a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll