header-logo header-logo

12 August 2010
Issue: 7430 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Time to stop legal aid tendering process?

Law Society wants compensation for family legal aid firms

The Law Society has demanded an immediate halt to the legal aid tendering process after it emerged that almost half of firms providing family law services have lost their contracts.

The Law Society has written to the Legal Services Commission (LSC) and the government calling for the tendering process to be suspended while a public review is carried out to see whether areas around the country will have enough coverage.

Wales, the south-west, north-east and Leeds are believed to be particularly lacking in family legal aid provision.

The society is also calling for compensation for firms which have lost contracts, and is taking legal advice on whether it can bring a judicial review.
The LSC has confirmed that the number of family law providers has fallen by about 46%, from 2,400 to about 1,300.

Despite the figures, Carolyn Downs, LSC chief executive, has said a reduction of the supplier base was not an intended outcome of the tendering process.

Meanwhile, Law Society president, Linda Lee has accused the LSC of losing control of the tendering process. 

“The fall-out from these tenders will see almost 50% of firms previously doing legal aid work removed in a matter of a few weeks and this will impact on families and vulnerable people, preventing them access to vital legal services.

“The society is fully supportive of the need for quality standards in tendering. The implications of the LSC’s own surprise at the outcome is that skilled and talented lawyers who weeks ago delivered a quality service will now be prevented from helping those in need. When even the LSC itself is saying the outcome was not intended, and when clients are deprived of legal advice and services and firms are seeing important contracts vanish, the government has to take a closer look at this and make a decision.”

The society is surveying its members to find out which firms are affected.

Issue: 7430 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll