header-logo header-logo

05 December 2012
Issue: 7541 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Time is running out...

Law Society expresses alarm over Jackson timetable

The civil courts and the road traffic accident (RTA) portal need more time to prepare for the Jackson reforms, the Law Society has claimed in a plea for a deadline extension.

Law Society president Lucy Scott-Moncrieff warned the Ministry of Justice this week that rushing the implementation of Pt 2 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO) risks creating extra costs and clogging up the courts.

Part 2 comes into force on 1 April 2013. The Law Society believes rushing the implementation could lead to “ambiguous and poorly considered” regulations, which in turn could result in “significant” satellite litigation.

Scott-Moncrieff pointed out that:

  • the necessary regulations and changes to the Civil Procedure Rules have yet to be published;
  • the RTA Portal Company has expressed doubts about its ability to meet the deadline requirements for employment liability and public liability claims, and the protocols for the process are not yet complete;
  • the rules governing qualified one-way costs shifting have yet to be approved;
  • implementation will require law firms to change case-management systems, work processes and business planning;
  • the Ministry of Justice has invited the Law Society for further discussions about the rules governing conditional fee arrangements and damages-based agreements, which suggests the regulations will not be available until early in the new year; and
  • there is a lack of clarity about the extent of the referral fee ban.

Scott-Moncrieff says: “Bringing all these complex changes into force on 1 April next year, in this rushed way and at breakneck speed, is a recipe for chaos.”

David Greene, NLJ consultant editor and partner at Edwin Coe, says: “Many stakeholders like the Law Society have expressed deep concern that the implementation of Pt 2 of LASPO is being rushed through with unnecessary and even dangerous haste.

“The Ministry seems hell-bent on meeting its own deadline of April 2013. While practitioners understand the message of commitment to the Jackson reforms this brings, there is really substantial concern that the rushed implementation is going to lead to ill-considered conclusions and satellite litigation.”

Issue: 7541 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll