header-logo header-logo

30 January 2010
Issue: 7402 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Time up for retirement?

The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has stepped up its campaign to abolish the default retirement age.

The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) has stepped up its campaign to abolish the default retirement age.

New EHRC proposals include government-led incentives for employers to offer flexible working for all employees, and government funding for workplace training in age management and flexibility. The House of Lords is currently debating whether to include the default retirement age in the Equality Bill, which could fast-track its removal.

Currently, the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006 allow employers to compulsorily retire workers at 65. The ruling in the high-profile “Heyday” case, last September, held the default retirement age to be lawful, although the judge, Mr Justice Blake, observed that there was a “compelling” argument for the age to be raised beyond 65. The government will review the default retirement age later this year.

An EHRC survey, Older workers: employment preferences, barriers and solutions, published this week, found 24% of men and 64% of women planned to keep working beyond the state pension age (currently 60 for women and 65 for men). Some 85% of people not working and over the state pension age say greater availability of part-time or flexible jobs would help them gain a job.

Baroness Margaret Prosser, deputy chairman of the EHRC, says: “Our research shows that to provide real opportunity to older workers, abolishing the default retirement age needs to be accompanied by a concerted drive by government, employers and agencies to meet the health, caring and work needs of the over-50s to enable them to remain in the workplace.”
 

Issue: 7402 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll