header-logo header-logo

26 September 2018
Issue: 7810 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Time for lawyers to get political

Party conference speakers to highlight risks of Brexit, LiPS & legal aid cuts

Barrister and solicitor representatives have hit the Labour, Conservative and Liberal Democrat party conference circuit, with the Law Society highlighting Brexit, access to justice and use of legal technology, and the Bar Council calling for more spending on the justice system.

Chair Andrew Walker QC and chair-elect Richard Atkins QC will be speaking at events organised by JUSTICE, Liberty, the Society of Labour Lawyers and the Society of Conservative Lawyers. In a briefing note for MPs and party members, the Bar Council said justice was ‘rising up the public, media and political agenda as the consequences of austerity measures are beginning to sink in’.

The Bar Council said the removal of legal aid from large areas of civil law had left law centres unable to cope and forced to turn away deserving clients whose problems spiralled out of control and became more expensive to put right. Judges were concerned about the rise in litigants in person (LiPs), whose cases took on average 50% longer to determine and resulted in more appeals, eating into court time and resources, it said, and justice should be properly funded in the next government spending round.

The Law Society said the EU ‘has facilitated an effective single market for legal services’, allowing lawyers and law firms to set up in the EU. Unless alternative arrangements were agreed, post-Brexit UK lawyers would fall back on more than 30 different national regulatory systems, ‘facing restrictions and limits to their practise rights’. It called on the government to negotiate mutual access for lawyers, including rights of audience in EU courts and legal professional privilege at the EU Commission.

On access to justice, the society urged the reinstatement of legal aid for early advice in housing and family law, to prevent escalation of problems.

Issue: 7810 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll