header-logo header-logo

03 August 2012 / Chris Gadd
Issue: 7525 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

Time for change

What avenues are open for the intervened solicitor, asks Chris Gadd

This is the story of a solicitor who lost everything (let us call him X). In December 2009, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) decided to intervene into X’s practice without any warning whatsoever. They convened their intervention committee in secret and presented to them a report that X had not seen. They prepared a draft resolution for the committee, a resolution that was adopted word for word. They then wrote to Barclays Bank and froze the practice bank accounts. Only then did they fax the intervention notice to X at 5.45pm.

The following morning, the SRA arrived at X’s office and took everything away. A week before Christmas he had to tell his staff that nobody would be paid, and that the firm had been forcibly closed. Then he had to go home to his family and ponder his future.

History

X’s “crime” was that he had briefly been a partner with a crooked solicitor at a previous firm, had reported that solicitor to the SRA and called in the police, and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll