header-logo header-logo

21 June 2007 / Colin Munro
Issue: 7278 / Categories: Features , Media
printer mail-detail

Time up for the ban?

Colin Munro explains why the ban on political advertising in broadcasting faces challenges

It is by no means obvious that charities campaigning to make poverty history should be banned from advertising on British television, when casinos and betting firms are being given greater freedom to advertise. Nor is it evident that an oil major or an airline should be able to advertise and boast of its green credentials, while an environmental group cannot advertise to rebut the claims. Yet these are the effects of the laws and code rules governing what may or may not be advertised on television or radio.

In particular, the wholesale ban on paid political advertising is an extensive restriction. In the UK, paid political advertising has never been permitted in the broadcast media. The current rule is found in the Communications Act 2003 (CA 2003), s 319, prohibiting political advertising, which is defined in s 321(2) as comprising:

“(a) an advertisement which is inserted by or on behalf of a body whose objects are wholly or mainly of a political nature;
(b) an advertisement which is directed towards a political

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll