header-logo header-logo

09 September 2026
Issue: 8176 / Categories: Legal News , Dispute resolution , Legal services , Fees
printer mail-detail

Tiered fees for complaints could be costly

Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned

LeO plans to make law firms pay £200, £750 or £1,500 depending on the stage at which the complaint is resolved. Law firms could escape the fee only if the complaint was resolved in the lawyer’s favour or dismissed and LeO was satisfied the firm had taken all reasonable steps to resolve it at the first-tier stage.

However, CILEX president Sara Fowler expressed ‘concerns about firms being driven to make unwarranted payments over fears that a complaint going to the ombudsman will prove even more costly’. She called for ‘proportionate case fees and a fair process’.

Law Society president Mark Evans warned there was ‘a real risk that the proposals will encourage firms to settle complaints regardless of merit, simply because it is cheaper’.

LeO’s consultation, ‘Changes to scheme rules, case fees, and publication of ombudsman decisions’, closed last week.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll