header-logo header-logo

02 September 2011 / Edward Heaton
Issue: 7479 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Tidal waive

Ed Heaton examines a timely reminder to all about the dangers of waiving privilege

Lord Justice Ward described D (A Child) [2011] EWCA Civ 684, [2011] All ER (D) 83 (Jun) as a case with “an interesting and unusual twist”. It related to serious injuries suffered by a 6-month-old boy, which included fractures to his left humerus, his left tibia and a number of his ribs. The particular matter before the Court of Appeal was the relatively simple question of the extent to which the mother had waived legal professional privilege.

In order to appreciate the judgment fully, one needs an understanding of the basic background to the case.

The facts

In a witness statement in January 2011, the mother indicated that the father had told her that the child had got his arm stuck between the fabric and the metal side of his buggy and that the father had therefore had to pull the child’s arm, which had resulted in injury. The mother specifically stated that she had “not witnessed anyone hurting” the child and that, if the father had caused the injury,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll