header-logo header-logo

02 September 2011 / Edward Heaton
Issue: 7479 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Tidal waive

Ed Heaton examines a timely reminder to all about the dangers of waiving privilege

Lord Justice Ward described D (A Child) [2011] EWCA Civ 684, [2011] All ER (D) 83 (Jun) as a case with “an interesting and unusual twist”. It related to serious injuries suffered by a 6-month-old boy, which included fractures to his left humerus, his left tibia and a number of his ribs. The particular matter before the Court of Appeal was the relatively simple question of the extent to which the mother had waived legal professional privilege.

In order to appreciate the judgment fully, one needs an understanding of the basic background to the case.

The facts

In a witness statement in January 2011, the mother indicated that the father had told her that the child had got his arm stuck between the fabric and the metal side of his buggy and that the father had therefore had to pull the child’s arm, which had resulted in injury. The mother specifically stated that she had “not witnessed anyone hurting” the child and that, if the father had caused the injury,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll