header-logo header-logo

13 November 2008
Issue: 7345 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Three double acts

Democracy and human rights are bedding down well, says Roger Smith

Lady Justice Arden, tipped soon to join Baroness Hale on what will become the Supreme Court, has given a spirited defence of the Human Rights Act (HRA 1998). The “overarching” point of her address to a JUSTICE conference was that HRA 1998 has changed the way in which we think about democracy: “One of the byproducts of the Convention is that when it comes to qualified rights we are expressly directed to think about democracy …[and] much more thought … could usefully now be given to what is meant by ‘necessary in a democratic society’.”

This is a phrase used in the European Convention on Human Rights to qualify rights such as that of freedom of speech. Lady Arden speculated about how the creation of the Supreme Court might change the procedures of the House of Lords. The court will have, she acknowledged, the same powers as the existing appellate committee of the House of Lords. However, it was the “start of a new chapter” and it might be that the court would change the criteria

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll