header-logo header-logo

03 June 2010
Issue: 7420 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Third party funding too exclusive?

Third party litigation funding “does nothing” for ordinary consumers, according to new research.

A study by Oxford and Lincoln universities, published this week, looks at whether third party litigation funding could give people with limited means greater access to justice for civil claims.

Preliminary findings show that most of the claims levels are in excess of £100,000, which exclude ordinary consumers.

Principal investigator, Dr Christopher Hodges, of Oxford University, says: “Our research shows that litigation funding currently benefits SME companies in accessing justice.

“This new form of funding has revealed an unknown area of demand for enforcement of civil law. Ensuring that small companies are able to claim when they are commercially disadvantaged, such as where contracts or licensing agreements are breached, is important for maintaining a healthy economy.”

 

 

Issue: 7420 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll