header-logo header-logo

Third party funding: a litigation lifeline?

25533
Simon Davenport QC, Daniel Goldblatt & Sergey Litovchenko on finding third party litigation funding in the age of COVID-19

In brief

  • How lawyers and their clients can best position themselves to apply for and negotiate third party litigation funding.

As the COVID-19 pandemic and economic fallout drain liquidity from businesses and individuals, self-financing lawsuits will become increasingly challenging. Meanwhile, the litigation finance industry, which has tended to be non-correlated to financial markets or counter-cyclical, is in a position to provide a lifeline. But with so much demand for cash, funders will become more discerning about which cases they back and will charge more for their services.

Third party funding, otherwise known as litigation funding or finance, is the loaning of capital by a fund or investment firm to cover a party’s legal costs, which is repayable (with a return) in the event of a successful claim. Put crudely; it is paying for litigation when a party has a good case but either cannot afford or will not fund it themselves. As set out

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll