header-logo header-logo

04 November 2016 / Bryan Greetham
Issue: 7721 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Thinking smart

Lawyers need to go beyond the bounds of orthodox thinking, says Bryan Greetham

During the inter-war period a German chemist was searching for what we would now describe as an antibiotic. Every evening before he left his laboratory he would set out bacteria in petri dishes so they could grow during the night ready for him to work on them the next day. But day after day he noticed that many of the bacteria were dead with mould spores on them. He concluded that the spores came from the mould growing in the corners of the laboratory. Therefore he had it thoroughly cleaned and decontaminated, so he could carry on his work.

Unfortunately he was unable to find a chemical substance that was successful in killing the bacteria. Yet, if he had been able to free himself from the orthodox explanations and expectations of his profession, he might have realised that the mould spores that killed the bacteria could have been a source of the very antibiotic he was looking for. He might then have won the Nobel Prize that later went to Sir Alexander Fleming, who discovered

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll