header-logo header-logo

14 May 2020 / Stephen Levinson
Issue: 7886 / Categories: Opinion , Employment
printer mail-detail

They’ve got it!

20710
Stephen Levinson welcomes the Law Commission’s (excellent) report on Employment Law Hearing Structures

It is a pleasure to welcome this report. Dry though the subject matter may seem it deals with issues of real practical importance. The Law Commission has not previously reported on employment law. Generally, they avoid anything politically controversial so most of the substantive law is out of bounds. This report deals with the jurisdiction of tribunals, the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT), and the civil courts in employment matters. It does not review the current discussions about the possible restructuring of the employment law system. What it does is discuss all of the possible changes to the structure (‘Employment Law Hearing Structures: Report’, (Law Com No 390), April 2020, https://go.aws/3csG42K).

The first thing to welcome is that the Commission clearly understand the unique ethos and role of the employment tribunal, declare what it is, and make clear they wish it preserved. This distinguishes them from all governments over the last twenty years which have shown no such understanding. The no-cost regime, relative lack of formality, a three-member constitution, relaxed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll