header-logo header-logo

06 May 2016 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7697 / Categories: Features , Public , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Theresa May up a gum tree

nlj_7697_zander

Michael Zander QC on the Home Secretary’s attempt to justify withdrawal from the ECHR while remaining in the EU

Theresa May certainly got a reaction when she urged last week (25 April) that while remaining in the EU, the UK should withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). In her first speech of the EU referendum campaign, Mrs May said we should leave the ECHR because “it can bind the hands of Parliament” and “makes us less secure by preventing the deportation of dangerous foreign nationals”.

She was swiftly and categorically slapped down by Michael Gove, Secretary of State for Justice, the minister in charge of the topic, who told MPs that he agreed with former Attorney General Dominic Grieve. “Both of us believe that we should remain within the European Convention on Human Rights”. His junior minister, Mr Dominic Raab, and the present Attorney General, Mr Jeremy Wright QC, responding to an urgent question in the Commons on 26 April both confirmed that the government’s policy was to remain part of the ECHR. Tory MP Jacob Rees-Mogg,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll