header-logo header-logo

The pension split

09 January 2026 / Joanna Newton
Issue: 8144 / Categories: Features , Family , Pensions , Divorce , Equality
printer mail-detail
239519
The humble pension sharing order is 25 years old: if you’re not celebrating, you should be, says Joanna Newton
  • A discussion of pension sharing orders (PSOs) and the role pensions play in financial remedy.
  • Explains why PSOs are underused, and highlights the importance of ensuring clients understand their short, medium and long-term financial considerations.

Twenty-five years of pension sharing orders (PSOs) is unlikely to be marked on many calendars. Nevertheless, the recent anniversary of the first order to be issued should not go unnoticed, primarily as an opportunity to highlight their value in ensuring long-term financial security for divorcees.

What are PSOs?

Pension sharing orders are sub-orders made within a financial consent order as part of financial remedy proceedings upon divorce. They essentially do what they say on the tin: they enable the sharing of a portion of one party’s pension with the other party to ensure a fair split of the matrimonial assets upon divorce.

PSOs will identify how much pension is to be transferred to the receiving spouse. When the transfer happens depends on the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll