header-logo header-logo

The new rules of transparency

238285
Reforms to open justice mean parties will need to be proactive, writes Antonia Glover
  • The new Transparency and Open Justice Board Key Objectives set out a framework for widespread reform of the rules around public access to court and tribunal hearings, making it easier for non-parties to access documents filed in court proceedings and court hearings.
  • The exact rule changes will be developed by individual courts and tribunals. The High Court has already announced changes to its rules around access to court documents, expected to come into force in January 2026.
  • Litigants need to be aware that court proceedings are set to become much more public. Any applications to derogate from open justice principles will need to be carefully justified.

In April 2024, the Lady Chief Justice of England and Wales announced a new Transparency and Open Justice Board to spearhead reform of the court and tribunal system. In July 2025, the board released its finalised key objectives, setting out the principles of a reform agenda in respect of public access to court hearings and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll