header-logo header-logo

05 March 2020 / David Greene
Issue: 7877 / Categories: Opinion , Brexit
printer mail-detail

The Lugano Convention: a good first step

16966
David Greene commends the government’s commitment to Lugano & hopes that similar good sense will prevail in the EU
  • Importance of the government’s decision to accede to the Lugano Convention.
  • The introduction of the Private International Law (Implementation of Agreements) Bill.

If there is a litigation god he might come in the form of Michael Gove, at least in the short term, through the prism of the government’s decision to accede to the Lugano Convention. Many may be surprised to hear that this was not in any way a given. Despite earlier commitments it was entirely possible that Lugano might have, through perception, been washed up in the government’s red line against any continuing influence of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). There appeared to be, in certain government circles, the misperception that the CJEU has a direct influence on domestic law through the mechanisms of the Lugano Convention. Further there seemed a suspicion that Lugano is an instrument through which the EU drives a wider European single market in all Convention territories. Stakeholders

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll