header-logo header-logo

The lawyers’ levy for access to justice?

MPs have launched an inquiry into access to justice, including the potential for an ‘access to justice fund levy’

The cross-party Justice Committee, chaired by Andy Slaughter MP, will examine the current state of the legal services market, the impact of litigants in person, the potential for technology to support access to justice and scope for new ways of funding. Written submissions are invited by 30 September, including on a possible ‘levy’.

The idea of asking high-earning lawyers to contribute to an access to justice fund has previously been floated by former Lord Chancellors Michael Gove and Alex Chalk.

The committee will also look at the impact of the Legal Aid Agency cyber-attack, uncovered in April, on lawyers and clients, and at the continuing impact of LASPO (Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012).

Slaughter said: ‘Given the persistent problem of legal aid deserts leaving the sector close to crisis, the committee will assess how the current system could be improved… with suitably remunerated legal practice.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll