header-logo header-logo

The individual under international criminal law (Pt 1)

130190
In the first of a two-part series, Simon Parsons charts the development of individual liability for international crimes
  • Prior to 1945, there was little evidence that crimes against peace and crimes against humanity had crystallised as international crimes as part of customary international law.
  • The Nuremberg trials laid the foundations of modern international criminal law based on individual criminal responsibility.

This article explores the lack of individual liability for international crime up until 1945. It is noted that the Nuremberg war crime trials of leading Nazi officials laid the groundwork for personal international criminal liability for a criminal war, and for the international criminal justice process in which those responsible for such a war are held responsible. It is hoped, one day, this same process may be applied against the major war criminal Vladimir Putin and his subordinates.

International criminal law pre-1945

The evidence for individual criminal liability for international crime in this period is limited. However, the conviction of Peter von Hagenbach in 1474 for war crimes, after he allowed his soldiers

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll