header-logo header-logo

12 August 2020 / Sheena Cassidy Hope
Issue: 7899 / Categories: Features , Covid-19 , Family
printer mail-detail

The Family Court of the Future

25807
Remote hearings, video hearings or no hearing at all? Sheena Cassidy Hope considers how the family courts might evolve

In brief

  • New ways of working could present opportunities for a more streamlined, 21st century Family Court.
  • Changes must ensure that access to justice is properly maintained, particularly for the most vulnerable in society.

Reform of the Family Court is not a new topic. The current HMCTS reform programme was launched in 2016, with a stated vision of modernising and upgrading the justice system so that it works better for all users. While the increased use of online applications, a move towards paperless courts and ‘fully’ video hearings were key aspects of the reform programme, few could have anticipated these becoming widespread practice within a matter of weeks (and in some instances, days). But with the lockdown imposed in March by the Government to suppress the spread of COVID-19 causing the courts, legal profession and litigants to unexpectedly partake in a sudden and unorthodox pilot, to what extent are the new ways of working here to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll