header-logo header-logo

24 January 2020 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7871 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

The EU Withdrawal Agreement Bill (No 2) (Pt 2)

14747
Michael Zander on the final stages
  • Despite inflicting five defeats in the House of Lords, the Opposition accepted that the Government would overturn all the amendments and that they would have to accept it.
  • Royal Assent would be given in time for the Withdrawal Agreement to be considered by the European Parliament.

Until the Report stage in the House of Lords last Monday (January 20) the Government still hoped that its European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill would come back to the Commons unamended. But in the end the Lords decided there were issues on which they had to make a stand.

The Government does not command a majority in the Lords and the word had gone out from Ministers that amendments would not be welcomed. During the three days of the Committee stage in the Lords (14, 15,16 January) not a single amendment was put to a vote. Each proposer ran their proposition up the hill but then bottled and withdrew the amendment.

One reason obviously was the so-called Salisbury Convention which forbids the Lords

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll