header-logo header-logo

01 August 2019 / Anthony Owen
Issue: 7851 / Categories: Features , Property , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-detail

The elasticity of reasonable promptitude

Anthony Owen has some words of advice for long leaseholders applying for relief from forfeiture: time is of the essence

  • The Court of Appeal has confirmed that an application for relief from forfeiture must be made no more than six months after a property has been repossessed.
  • Tenants under long leases must ensure that payments are duly made, regardless of occupation of the property.

The case of Lakeside Developments Ltd v Gibbs [2018] EWCA Civ 2874, [2019] All ER (D) 38 (Jan) contains some salutary warnings for long leaseholders, particularly those who may for one reason or another have been out of occupation of their leasehold premises for a period of time and not taken steps to ensure that payments of rent and service charges are kept up to date.

The facts of the case

The claimant, Caroline Gibbs, was a tenant of a studio flat under a lease for 999 years granted in 1986 at a commencing yearly rent of £50. She was also liable to pay insurance premiums. In 1990, the claimant went to live and work

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll