header-logo header-logo

15 March 2024 / Malcolm Bishop KC
Issue: 8063 / Categories: Features , EU , Constitutional law , Public
printer mail-detail

The ECHR: out of order or out of fashion

163725
Malcolm Bishop KC looks back on the UK’s role in shaping our European Convention rights

‘We need to get rid of this European Convention! We can’t have foreign judges in foreign courts telling us what to do—we need to take back control.’ These and similar sentiments could be heard not only in the hostelries up and down the country but even occasionally in the Inns of Court. But we should be careful what we wish for, because the consequences may be the opposite of that intended.

Drafting the Convention

It might be helpful therefore to look at what some seek to get rid of, and how it all started. On 4 November 1950, some 15 European states met at Rome to sign the European Convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms. The UK was a prominent member of that meeting and indeed the text of the convention itself was largely the work of a team of Oxbridge professors headed by Sir David Maxwell Fife, later to occupy the woolsack as Lord

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll