header-logo header-logo

15 March 2024 / Malcolm Bishop KC
Issue: 8063 / Categories: Features , EU , Constitutional law , Public
printer mail-detail

The ECHR: out of order or out of fashion

163725
Malcolm Bishop KC looks back on the UK’s role in shaping our European Convention rights

‘We need to get rid of this European Convention! We can’t have foreign judges in foreign courts telling us what to do—we need to take back control.’ These and similar sentiments could be heard not only in the hostelries up and down the country but even occasionally in the Inns of Court. But we should be careful what we wish for, because the consequences may be the opposite of that intended.

Drafting the Convention

It might be helpful therefore to look at what some seek to get rid of, and how it all started. On 4 November 1950, some 15 European states met at Rome to sign the European Convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms. The UK was a prominent member of that meeting and indeed the text of the convention itself was largely the work of a team of Oxbridge professors headed by Sir David Maxwell Fife, later to occupy the woolsack as Lord

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll