header-logo header-logo

14 January 2022 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7962 / Categories: Opinion , Constitutional law , Human rights
printer mail-detail

The assault on liberty updated

68391
Michael Zander QC considers the Justice Secretary’s plans for a modern Bill of Rights

In 2009, Dominic Raab then a youngish lawyer, a year before becoming an MP, wrote The assault on liberty—what went wrong with rights? (Fourth Estate). It urged that, while remaining a member of the European Convention on Human Rights, the Human Rights Act 1998 (the Act) should be replaced by a British Bill of Rights to ‘focus our judiciary on its primary task, which is to give effect to British rights instead of trying to divine and decipher the murky case law emanating from Strasbourg’.

No one could sensibly have imagined then that a little over a decade later Raab would be Justice Secretary, (pictured) heading government decision-making on reforming the Act.

What’s proposed?

On 14 December 2021, the Justice Secretary published ‘Human Rights Act reform—a modern Bill of Rights’, a consultation paper setting out the government’s proposals and inviting answers to 29 questions by 8 March. On the same day, he published ‘The independent Human Rights Act review’, conducted by a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll