header-logo header-logo

18 November 2022 / Ravi Aswani , Valya Georgieva
Issue: 8003 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Arbitration , ADR
printer mail-detail

The Arbitration Act 1996: a reflection at 25 years (Pt 4)

100873
Challenging an arbitration award under section 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996: Ravi Aswani & Valya Georgieva discuss appeals on a point of law
  • Challenging an arbitration award under section 69 of the Arbitration Act 1996.
  • The Law Commission’s proposal that no reform to section 69 is necessary, as it strikes a workable compromise between finality and consistency in application of the law.

Where the seat of the arbitration is England, Wales or Northern Ireland (assumed for the purposes of this article), the Arbitration Act 1996 (AA 1996) confirms, in s 58, that unless otherwise agreed by the parties, an award made by the tribunal pursuant to an arbitration agreement is final and binding on them. However, AA 1996 sets out three routes to challenge an arbitral award: ss 67, 68 and 69 of the AA 1996. Sections 67 (substantive jurisdiction) and 68 (serious irregularity) are mandatory provisions, while s 69 (point of law) can be contracted out of by the agreement of the parties.

This is the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll