header-logo header-logo

Terrorism

05 January 2012
Issue: 7495 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

CC v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2011] EWHC 3316 (Admin), [2011] All ER (D) 160 (Dec)

The powers created by Sch 7 of the Terrorism Act 2000 were far reaching and, so far as the power to detain was concerned, affected the liberty of the person.

Accordingly, they had to be, in principle, strictly construed and it was incumbent on the officer to inform the person that he was being detained and why.

< The fact that detention was not used in the vast majority of cases where a Sch 7 examination was considered necessary did not affect the correct construction of the powers since detention might be required. The only purpose of any examination had to be to determine whether a person was a terrorist within the meaning of s 40(1)(b). In principle, how and the extent to which a person appeared to be a terrorist could provide a lawful justification for the Sch 7 examination. However, all would depend on what the officers knew and why they had decided to use their powers.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll